Kirk Adams, the Arizona House of Representatives, the President, Washington Post article today, has a controversial Arizona. Here is a selection of:
By law, agents are only "legal link" is defined as a legal arrest or the arrest of a stop and try to identify the immigration status of anyone. Any "suspicious" can only be obtained through the investigation of criminal offenses or other crimes. "Can I see your papers?": Only the man said, worry that the law should be taken into account.
Ask the police ask to see a variety of papers - they have reasonable suspicion or not. Identification of the work on the floor, standing, or fewer, people question what is the effect of, any: from the viewpoint of law, constitutional, and practical, this is the biggest problem? If returned, the population decline, the police are one step further, and say: "This is your right, Sir, you have to go", or the police, to answer questions as to the identity of the person, improves productivity by giving an order, the person who is arrested and threatened to arrest or false charges against someone?
Police (completely legal), and the people fade (the police power of the Constitution are limited) training for dealing with "forced" with the 'voluntary' in the line are split between each other. "Yes friends, the opportunity to see what is in your pocket!": For example, if a police officer said it was only when asked (Halal) or Command (for my purposes here, to break the law) is unclear. He seems to speak here because it is the responsibility of the volunteers agreed that the search is done: "Officer, I do not agree with us." Officials were (a) After hearing that the backward, and (b) states that they (c) approval has been ordered back to the people to ask. You can not deny what you say is false and the genuine official - and this comes to trial, the results are believed to be the judge. Worldliness a serious practical objections.
These vehicles, warrant, probable cause or suspicion on the stop. Far as I know, all the cars stopped. Ask the driver refused to answer police about immigration status.And as fast as the police know the man and the law with "self" is not clear that interest meet - she wants the road. To clarify the situation, the police often try to avoid. If arrested, the police, the driver away from the run or the (bad) do not want to fight, it is - but if the police were to be placed, the driver does not want to talk to hang with them - he wants the road. The police for false and / or illegal, he was arrested for threatening to explore - the answer to their questions. "Work".Questions - the police, "security" threat, or "block" or to cause them to block his view that the threat of police operations to discover, select a group of people were arrested, but there is no showing that occur in this case and the answers to produce identity documents. Here is a rare situation in which the right-handed. Residents are understandably intimidated by the threat may not be bad, but it can not be done to comply. In business, he has been deported within a few hours. This video is a real public service announcement - on immigration from any of your observations, how to understand clearly the police were dealing with.
See also the federal government, not Arizona, his music video by the police. They claim those who have not left unattended when the alert about the Constitution, so that "Arizona is already doing what the federal government." It is doubtful that the Obama Administration wants to be heard in contrast to the federal police reform.Challenge to the racial / ethnic reasons rather than trying to calculate ways to obtain a pair of Arizona, they try to keep the federal police power. Arizona law is simply misguided, but their legal challenge.
By law, agents are only "legal link" is defined as a legal arrest or the arrest of a stop and try to identify the immigration status of anyone. Any "suspicious" can only be obtained through the investigation of criminal offenses or other crimes. "Can I see your papers?": Only the man said, worry that the law should be taken into account.
Ask the police ask to see a variety of papers - they have reasonable suspicion or not. Identification of the work on the floor, standing, or fewer, people question what is the effect of, any: from the viewpoint of law, constitutional, and practical, this is the biggest problem? If returned, the population decline, the police are one step further, and say: "This is your right, Sir, you have to go", or the police, to answer questions as to the identity of the person, improves productivity by giving an order, the person who is arrested and threatened to arrest or false charges against someone?
Police (completely legal), and the people fade (the police power of the Constitution are limited) training for dealing with "forced" with the 'voluntary' in the line are split between each other. "Yes friends, the opportunity to see what is in your pocket!": For example, if a police officer said it was only when asked (Halal) or Command (for my purposes here, to break the law) is unclear. He seems to speak here because it is the responsibility of the volunteers agreed that the search is done: "Officer, I do not agree with us." Officials were (a) After hearing that the backward, and (b) states that they (c) approval has been ordered back to the people to ask. You can not deny what you say is false and the genuine official - and this comes to trial, the results are believed to be the judge. Worldliness a serious practical objections.
These vehicles, warrant, probable cause or suspicion on the stop. Far as I know, all the cars stopped. Ask the driver refused to answer police about immigration status.And as fast as the police know the man and the law with "self" is not clear that interest meet - she wants the road. To clarify the situation, the police often try to avoid. If arrested, the police, the driver away from the run or the (bad) do not want to fight, it is - but if the police were to be placed, the driver does not want to talk to hang with them - he wants the road. The police for false and / or illegal, he was arrested for threatening to explore - the answer to their questions. "Work".Questions - the police, "security" threat, or "block" or to cause them to block his view that the threat of police operations to discover, select a group of people were arrested, but there is no showing that occur in this case and the answers to produce identity documents. Here is a rare situation in which the right-handed. Residents are understandably intimidated by the threat may not be bad, but it can not be done to comply. In business, he has been deported within a few hours. This video is a real public service announcement - on immigration from any of your observations, how to understand clearly the police were dealing with.
See also the federal government, not Arizona, his music video by the police. They claim those who have not left unattended when the alert about the Constitution, so that "Arizona is already doing what the federal government." It is doubtful that the Obama Administration wants to be heard in contrast to the federal police reform.Challenge to the racial / ethnic reasons rather than trying to calculate ways to obtain a pair of Arizona, they try to keep the federal police power. Arizona law is simply misguided, but their legal challenge.
Tidak ada komentar:
Posting Komentar